<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Everyday Estate Planning</title>
        <link>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:03:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>Being an Agent for Health Care-Wild Ride Pt. 1</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>My Dad fell really ill almost one month ago, on January 25, 2010. I have been his agent for health care for years. He's been in the hospital before, but I've&nbsp;never had to step in to protect his well-being before. I knew, in an intellectual way, what it means to be named as a health care agent (you are the one&nbsp; who will make medical decisions if the principal (the person you are acting for) is unable to do so)--but I wasn't prepared for either the emotional or practical aspect of the job. </p>
<p>Here's the first big lesson: PLEASE MAKE REALLY SURE THAT YOU KNOW WHAT&nbsp;THE PRINCIPAL&nbsp;WANTS BEFORE ANYONE ASKS YOU TO DECIDE SOMETHING.</p>
<p>When the doctors call you up in the middle of the night and ask whether or not they should put your parent on a ventilator (which means they stick a tube down into the lungs and a machine does the breathing), you really ought to have had that discussion before the call. Saying "NO" may well mean that your parent won't make it through the night. Saying "YES" may well mean that your parent gets stuck in the ICU, unconscious, with a machine doing the breathing....for a very long time, or maybe forever.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Here's the second big lesson: YOU MAY NEED TO REALLY&nbsp;FIGHT WITH THE DOCTORS TO GET WHAT YOUR PRINCIPAL WANTS.</p>
<p>The doctors may call you and ask what to do. But if you're not there, they may very well do what they think should be done, regardless of what you've told them.&nbsp;More on this tomorrow.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2010/02/being-an-agent-for-health-care.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2010/02/being-an-agent-for-health-care.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:03:46 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Carry-Over Basis: Another Estate Tax Repeal Oddity</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Last week I wrote about the 'death' and probable re-birth of the estate tax by 2011, if not sooner. Today, though, I want to tell you about the new carry-over basis rules. Until now, if you inherited an asset from someone who died, you also got a new tax basis equal to the value of that asset at the time of death. That's called a <strong>stepped-up basis</strong>.</p>
<p>The cost basis is the dollar amount the asset was worth when you purchased an item (with certain adjustments), and it's that value that the IRS uses to determine if there's been a gain or a loss on the sale. You pay capital gains taxes on the difference between the cost basis and the sales price.&nbsp;A higher basis means less of a gain when you sell, if the value of the asset has gone up.</p>
<p>The stepped-up basis was a big tax break for heirs. What it meant is that if your mother left you a house worth $1 million dollars that she purchased for $100,000 and then you turned around a sold it for $1 million dollars, you'd owe ZERO capital gains tax on that sale. And it was an unlimited tax-break, you got that step-up on all of the assets inherited at death.</p>
<p>But not this year. Now, each taxpayer is limited to $1.3 million dollars worth of a stepped-up basis. It will be their executor's job to allocate that to particular assets, like a house, and therefore to specific heirs. There's also a $3 million step-up available to spouses for appreciated assets. But all other assets are to be valued at their original value.</p>
<p>So, if your father purchased stock in IBM for a pittance in 1963, you're going to have to find out what that was and pay capital gains on the difference between that value and what you're selling it for today. That's called a carry-over basis, and it is going to make accountants and heirs nuts as they try and figure out what the original values are for long-ago purchased assets. Not to mention how much fun it will be to pay all those captial gains taxes.</p>
<p>To read more about this, read Kathleen Pender's good summary from the <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/01/09/BULP1BFGS6.DTL&amp;type=business">SF Chronicle</a>.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2010/01/carryover-basis-another-estate.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2010/01/carryover-basis-another-estate.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Estate Tax</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:48:18 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The Estate Tax is Dead; Long Live the Estate Tax</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>In a twist of Congressional inaction that no one honestly thought possible, Congress, by failing to act, has allowed the estate tax to be fully repealed in 2010. But, and get this, only for one year! </p>
<p>In 2011, unless Congress acts, the estate tax is scheduled to come back at levels not seen since 2001 (the tax would fall on any estate worth more than 1 million dollars and at rates ranging from 37% to 55%). The current law, passed in 2001, expires in 2011, so the tax comes back at 2001 levels, with an adjustment for inflation.</p>
<p>If that's not odd enough, most congressional watchers predict that Congress will actually pass a law re-instating the tax that will be retroactive to January 1, 2010 (so, as a matter of reality, there will be no actual repeal whatsoever!)</p>
<p>Which is to say that no one really knows what will happen over the next few months. But certainly, something will. I'll keep you posted.</p>
<p>For more, see this <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126227670235611957.html?mod=rss_Today's_Most_Popular">article </a>in the Wall Street Journal, which offers a nice summary of the current state of affairs.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2010/01/the-estate-tax-is-dead-long-li.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2010/01/the-estate-tax-is-dead-long-li.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Estate Tax</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:57:57 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Organ Donation: Not Just For Steve Jobs</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Steve Jobs' recent return to the public eye after a liver transplant highlights the amazing benefits that can come from organ donation. In his own words, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE5884GR20090910">"I now have the liver of a mid-20s person who died in a car crash and was generous enough to donate their organs. I wouldn't be here without such generosity," </a></p>
<p>But organ donation is not a simple issue, and many have to wait for months or years for a suitable organ. A recent article in the <a href="http://www.daytondailynews.com/news/dayton-news/medical-mistrust-dissuades-people-from-being-organ-donors-271325.html">Ohio Dayton Daily News </a>reports that 54% percent of those eligible people are registered to donate organs (which means that close to half of those that could register to donate, don't). That puts Ohio ahead of most of the nation, though.</p>
<p>Nationally, according to the non-profit group <a href="http://www.donatelife.net/pdfs/DLA_Survey_Press_Release_and_Survey_Responses.pdf">Donate Life</a>, only 38% of drivers have registered to be organ donors, more than 100,000 people are awaiting a donated organ, and 18 people die each day waiting for available organs.</p>
<p>The article listed the following reasons why people choose not to register:</p>
<ul>
<li>Concerns about bodily integrity.</li>
<li>Worries that signing a donor card may 'jinx' them.</li>
<li>Mistrust of doctors and fear that they won't get proper care if they are registered organ donors.</li>
<li>Religion.</li></ul>
<p>To learn how to register to donate organs in your state, go to <a href="http://www.donatelife.net">www.donatelife.net</a> or <a href="http://www.facebook.com/donatelife">www.facebook.com/donatelife</a>.<font color="#0000ff" size="3" face="ArialMT"><font color="#0000ff" size="3" face="ArialMT"><font color="#0000ff" size="3" face="ArialMT"></p>
<p></font></font></font><font size="3" face="ArialMT"><font size="3" face="ArialMT"><font color="#000000"></font>&nbsp;</p></font></font>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/09/organ-donation-not-just-for-st.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/09/organ-donation-not-just-for-st.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Estate Planning Basics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Organ Donation</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:02:31 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Dogs Fight Back: Fighting for Helmsley&apos;s Billions</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>
<p><img class="mt-image-none" height="305" alt="happy dogs.jpg" src="http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/happy%20dogs.jpg" width="393" /></p>
<p>First, Leona Helmsley died and left her 5 billion dollar fortune to be used to help dogs. Then, the trustees of the estate sued to change that and use only a small fraction of the fortune for dogs, and the rest for human philanthropic causes. Now, three large animal rights groups are appealing that decision and asking the New York Surrogate's Court to intervene and force the trustees to use more of the money to help dogs, in accordance with Leona Helmsley's wishes.</p>
<p></p>
<p><a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-11349-Louisville-Animal-Rescue-Examiner~y2009m9d4-Leona-Helmsleys-gift-to-rescue-organizations-stalled">
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="DISPLAY: inline">&nbsp;</span>"Just a fraction of the money involved in Mrs. Helmsley's estate is a game-changer for animal welfare," says Marsha Perelman, ASPCA Board Chair. "The fate of dogs in this country could very well rest on the decision of this lawsuit--it is that critical."</a><br /></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/09/dogs-fight-back-fighting-for-h.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/09/dogs-fight-back-fighting-for-h.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 07:00:38 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Palliative Care--Making the Best of a Bad Diagnosis</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Senator Kennedy's death this week from malignant brain cancer highlights the limits of medical treatment. He received the best medical care possible, and still died in little over a year from his cancer -- the most common form of brain cancer, one with no effective treatment.</p>
<p>At the same time, by all accounts, his last year was mostly a good one, filled with family, attention to the things that mattered most to him,&nbsp;and the opportunity to die where he wished to be.</p>
<p>It's a last year that many would hope for. But not all are able to enjoy. Sometimes it takes an advocate within the medical establishment to help families find peace and comfort at the end of life. Not all doctors are trained to deliver bad news at all, let alone to do so tactfully and with full recognition of what it means.</p>
<p>The&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/20/health/20doctors.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=1">New York Times </a>recently ran a long article about a branch of medicine dedicated to helping more people end their lives with dignity and comfort. If you or your family find yourself dealing with end of life care, find out if there's a palliative care physician available in your health plan, and take advantage of their training. Their focus is on comfort at end of life, not aggresive medical intervention that will ultimately only prolong, not prevent, death.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/09/palliative-caremaking-the-best.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/09/palliative-caremaking-the-best.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Estate Planning Basics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Trusts</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Wills</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 07:18:34 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>State Estate &amp; Inheritance Taxes Too</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>At the moment, almost all of us don't have to worry about paying federal estate taxes at death. That's because the first $3.5 million of our estates can pass to our heirs tax free. Scheduled to expire in 2010, this limit is likely to be extended by Congress for at least another year and most experts think it is unlikely to be reduced significantly over the next few years.</p>
<p>But here's a new wrinkle--until 2005 most states collected a share of the federal estate taxes collected. But when that 'pick-up' tax expired, they began imposing estate taxes of their own to make up for that lost revenue.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kivitv.com/Global/story.asp?S=10961669">Currently, 16 states and the District of Columbia impose their own separate estates taxes. And several states (Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Nebraska, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Tennessee) also impose an inheritance tax.</a> This falls on those who receive the money when someone dies. And, in many instances, the limit for tax-free transfers for both state tax&nbsp;regimes&nbsp;is less than that federal limit. Which means it's possible for an estate to be free of the federal estate tax while being subject to state estate tax or inheritance taxes.</p>
<p>So, for those doing estate planning in these states, make sure to consider the state angle when considering the&nbsp;probable taxes your heir may face.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/08/state-estate-inheritance-tax.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/08/state-estate-inheritance-tax.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Estate Tax</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Trusts</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 06:59:49 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Wills v. Trusts (and Michael Jackson)</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>This week, <a href="http://www.docstoc.com/docs/8016703/Michael-Jacksons-Will">Michael Jackson's will</a> was filed in the probate court. It was surprising, actually, that someone with his assets died with only a will. In California, it is common for those with property (even just a home) to create a living trust so that their assets will pass to their heirs without the cost and delay of a probate proceeding.</p>
<p>There are times, though, when probate can be an appropriate place to settle an estate, and Michael Jackson's might be the poster child for these cases -- when there are messy creditor claims to sort out. Like a bankruptcy court, a probate proceeding is place where creditors and their claims (and we won't even mention the guardianship issues being raised right now) can be sorted out by a court, in a set period of time and with finality.</p>
<p>The AP has published a good article if you're trying to sort out whether a <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h6dAiWt5V7L4zzpMzkZh-eT4xyAAD9973U9O4">will or trust</a> makes more sense for your family. Briefly, though, if you live in a state (like California) where probate is expensive and time-consuming, if you want to leave everything to your kids, if you own&nbsp;a home, and if you don't have complex credit issues, a trust is generally a great long-term investment.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/07/wills-v-trusts-and-michael-jac.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/07/wills-v-trusts-and-michael-jac.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Estate Planning Basics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Guardianship</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Trusts</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Wills</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:28:15 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Michael Jackson&apos;s Mother Granted Temporary Guardianship</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Michael Jackson left behind a tangled financial web, sure to take many years and many lawsuits to sort out. But he also left behind three young children (aged 12, 11 and 7) and, apparently, no valid will (at least, one has not yet been submitted to the Los Angeles County Probate Court as of this post). <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090629/ap_on_en_mu/us_michael_jackson">Today, June 30, his mother, Katherine Jackson, has been appointed as their temporary guardian. Hearings will be held on July 6 and August 3rd to determine if she'll become their permanent guardian.</a></p>
<p>Since this (to put it mildly) is getting a lot of media attention, here's the legal background:</p>
<p>A guardian is in charge of a minor's care and custody, which means their food, clothing, shelter, education and medical needs. A guardian has to be appointed by a court order -- it's a kind of custody order really, granting someone other than a parent legal authority over a minor's care. If there's an emergency,&nbsp;a court can grant a&nbsp;temporary guardianship&nbsp;quickly.</p>
<p>But&nbsp;between now and the hearings, Katherine Jackson will have to do her best to find and notify Deborah Rowe, the mother of Jackson's two eldest children (his youngest was born to a surrogate mother who presumably waived any parental rights as part of the surrogacy).&nbsp; At the hearing, a judge will consider what would be in the best interest of Jackson's children. The notification of the children's mother is required in order to make sure that she has a chance to object to the guardianship at that hearing -- ordinarily, a parent has precedence over anyone else unless there are unusual circumstances, which abound here.</p>
<p>If Michael Jackson's will is found, and proved to be his valid last wishes, and the nominated guardian is not Katherine Jackson, the named person may contest the guardianship proceeding, too. But ultimately, it will be up to the judge to sort out the competing claims and decide what's best for the children.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090629/ap_on_en_mu/us_michael_jackson">It is reported that the petition also requested that Katherine Jackson be named the temporary guardian of the children's estate</a>,&nbsp; which means the person responsible for safeguarding Jackson's assets for the benefit of the children -- but this was rejected. AP also reports that Katherine Jackson has filed to be named the administrator of Jackson's estate -- the person who must inventory and appraise the estate's assets and manage them during what's likely to be a long and complicated probate proceeding.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/06/michael-jacksons-mother-grante.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/06/michael-jacksons-mother-grante.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Estate Planning Basics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Guardianship</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Trusts</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Wills</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:19:45 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>No Income Limits on Roth IRA Conversions as of January 1, 2010 </title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Part of the 2006 tax reconciliation bill is about to matter to many of us come January 1, 2010. It's sort of a good-news/bad-news deal -- but more good than bad for many. As of January 1, 2010, there will be no income limits for those who want to convert a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. That's good because until that date, households with an adjusted gross income of more than $100,000 were barred from converting their IRAs to Roth IRAs and married spouses filing alone were barred regardless of their income.</p>
<p>Roth IRAs, for those of you in need of a quick review, are retirement savings accounts where you pay the income taxes due&nbsp;when you contribute to the account -- then, it grows virtually tax-free and your withdrawals are also tax-free (but you don't get the income tax deduction when you contribute the money).</p>
<p>So, for those of you whose traditional IRAs are now worth far less than they used to be worth (that's the bad news part), converting to a Roth IRA in 2010 could be a great idea: Since the account is now worth so much less, the taxes on the conversion will also be much less than they might have been, and if tax rates go up in the future, as many predict they will, you'll have already paid the taxes due on the account.</p>
<p>For a good article on the ins and outs of the new rules, see this <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/focus-retirement/article/107222/Making-good-deal-retirement-even-better.html?mod=fidelity-readytoretire">article</a>&nbsp;from the <i>Wall Street Journal</i> online.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/06/as-of-january-1st-2010-no-inco.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/06/as-of-january-1st-2010-no-inco.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Estate Planning Basics</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:31:58 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Fake Checks and Sucker Lists -- Scams</title>
            <description><![CDATA[From the <i><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124520056162621509.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Wall Street Journal</a></i> comes a tale of how an elderly, well-educated man fell victim to fraudsters who lured him into writing checks for a variety of scams. In less than one year, he'd sent out $23,000 worth of checks -- despite repeated efforts on the part of his family to get local law enforcement and others involved. Finally, the victim granted his son a power of attorney to manage his finances -- but even then, he kept writing checks for scams.<br /><br />Scammers were extremely effective in gaining his trust, preying on his isolation to gain access to his confidential financial information. Worse, once he had gotten involved in a few of them, his name ended up on a "Sucker List" that was sold to other scammers, leading to an avalanche of other fraudulent offers. <br /><br />One scam, in particular, has gained in popularity: a fake check, purporting to be an advance payment for winnings to come. The victim cashes the check, sends the cash to the scammer, and then is on the hook when the check bounces a few days later.<br /><br />If your elderly relative is getting such calls and offers, here are some helpful tips from the article:<br /><br /><ul><li>Put their cell phone and landline on the FTC's Do Not Call Registry at <a href="https://www.donotcall.gov/">https://www.donotcall.gov/</a>.</li><li>Call the <a href="http://www.aarp.org/aarp/articles/want_to_fight_fraud.html">AARP's Fraud Fighter Call Center</a> at 1-800-646-2283.</li><li>Put scam mailings into an envelope and forward them to the Postal Inspector-Suspected Mail Fraud -- no postage is required.</li></ul>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/06/fake-checks-and-sucker-listssc.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/06/fake-checks-and-sucker-listssc.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Debt</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Estate Planning Basics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Power of Attorney</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:01:43 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>10 Things to Know Before You Hire a Financial Planner</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Estate planning and financial planning often go hand in hand. It makes a lot of sense to pay attention to what you've got when you're planning how to leave it responsibly to those you love. But it's a jungle out there when it comes to figuring out how to get the help you need.</p>
<p>Self-help&nbsp;is a great option, of course. But for those who want a real-live person to sit down, review your finances, and either make suggestions on what to do better or take over&nbsp; management of your assets, buyer beware. Financial planners are poorly regulated, poorly credentialed, and your remedies against a crooked one are few.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.smartmoney.com/Investing/Basics/10-Things-Your-Financial-Planner-Wont-Tell-You/?page=10"><i>SmartMoney</i> magazine</a> has a great article on how to be an informed consumer. Here are some of the highlights:</p>
<ul><li><strong>Find out how long the planner's been practicing</strong>. Better yet, ask them if they've passed the CFP (Certified Financial Planner) exam -- that's an exam that only 56,000 planners have passed out of the 650,000 folks out there who say they are financial planners.</li><li><strong>Notice if they are trying to give you advice or trying to sell you products. </strong>Stay away from those who are primarily selling products -- the odds are that they're steering you toward products that get them maximum compensation rather than those that will meet your needs best.</li><li><strong>Ask them if they are preparing your financial plan</strong> or hire outside consultants to do so.</li><li><strong>Find out how they are compensated</strong>. Are they fee-only or commission-based? It's not that one is necessarily better than another, but it's important to understand how they are being paid and to make sure that they will act in your, not their, best interests.</li><li><strong>Check with the SEC </strong>to see if they have received any complaints about the planner. <br /></li></ul>






]]></description>
            <link>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/06/10-things-to-know-before-you-h.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/06/10-things-to-know-before-you-h.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Estate Planning Basics</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:35:49 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Long Term Care Insurance Part of Kennedy Health Plan Proposal</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gap9wCaolRYguYQesA2i2Yr98yLgD98NLPT00">AP reports</a> that under Senator Kennedy's health care proposal, "Americans would be able to buy long-term care insurance from the government for $65 a month." People would enroll in the program during their working years. After five years of paying the premiums, they could receive benefits (worth not less than $50 per day)&nbsp;that would pay for a wide range of services designed to allow them to stay in their own homes and avoid moving into nursing homes.</p>
<p>The proposal is just one of many in the 651-page bill, which also includes changes to the way that health insurance is offered and taxed.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/06/long-term-care-insurance-part.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/06/long-term-care-insurance-part.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Estate Planning Basics</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:39:11 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>No Thanks, Dad -- Son Notifies Police of Stolen Art After Father&apos;s Death</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105218287">NPR reports</a> a story of interest to all of those who stand to inherit a collection of note from a parent. And it's a good reminder that you need to think about what you've inherited.</p>
<p>Collectibles dealer John Stasso amassed a large private collection worth millions, consisting&nbsp;of manuscripts, ancient books, artifacts, and antiquities that began with a trip to Italy in 1958. When his son, Joseph Sisto, realized that many of the artifacts had been illegally smuggled out of Italy, he confronted his father.&nbsp; When Joseph found out that his father had died, he immediately called the police. Two hours later, the FBI arrived, along with specialists who will inspect and return the artifacts to Italy, many of which hadn't been seen for a very long time.</p>
<p>"It's a huge relief," said Joseph, "because as much as I love my... family, this will also help them... They won't have to&nbsp;live with the oppression of thinking they have stolen or smuggled goods... It's sort of like trying to own a Mona Lisa in your house, you know."</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/06/no-thanks-dad-son-notifies-pol.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/06/no-thanks-dad-son-notifies-pol.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Estate Planning Basics</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:26:20 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Washington Woman First to Die Under State&apos;s Death with Dignity Law</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2009253737_suicide23m0.html">
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"></span></a>
</p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2009253737_suicide23m0.html"><img class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0px auto 20px; display: block; text-align: center;" alt="WA banner.jpg" src="http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/WA%20banner.jpg" width="228" height="168" /></a></span><a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2009253737_suicide23m0.html">The <i>Seattle Times</i> reported</a> on May 23, 2009,&nbsp;that Linda Fleming, a 66-year-old Washington state resident, became the first to die under Washington's Death With Dignity Law, enacted last year. Diagnosed with terminal pancreatic cancer, she choose to end her life before the increasing pain of her disease took away her ability to have the state of mind she wished to have at the end of her life.<br /><br />
<p>Family members, her beloved Chihuahua, Seri, and a physician were with her when she died, according to <a href="http://www.candcofwa.org/">Compassion &amp; Choices Washington</a>, the organization that sponsored the measure, which was adopted by Washington voters in November.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/06/washington-woman-first-to-die.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.estateplanninglawblawg.com/2009/06/washington-woman-first-to-die.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Assisted Suicide</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:02:11 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
